Thursday, September 3, 2020
The Maya Calendar
The Maya Calendar What is the Maya Calendar? The Maya, whose culture in Central America and southern Mexico topped around 800 A.D. prior to going into steep decay, had a propelled schedule framework that joined the development of the sun, moon and planets. For the Maya, time was recurrent and rehashed itself, making certain days or months fortunate or unfortunate for specific things, similar to horticulture or fruitfulness. The Maya schedule reset in December of 2012, rousing numerous to consider the to be as a finish of-days prediction. The Maya Concept of Time: To the Maya, time was patterned: it would rehash itself and certain days had attributes. This thought of repetitive rather than lineal time isn't obscure to us: for instance, numerous individuals believe Mondays to be ââ¬Å"badâ⬠days and Fridays to be ââ¬Å"goodâ⬠days (except if they fall on the thirteenth of the month, in which case they are unfortunate). The Maya took the idea further: despite the fact that we believe months and weeks to be repetitive, however years to be lineal, they considered untouched as patterned and certain days could ââ¬Å"returnâ⬠hundreds of years after the fact. The Maya knew that a sun powered year was around 365 days in length and they alluded to it as a ââ¬Å"haab.â⬠They separated a haab into 20 ââ¬Å"monthsâ⬠(to the Maya, ââ¬Å"uinalâ⬠) of 18 days each: to this was included 5 days every year for a sum of 365. These five days, called ââ¬Å"wayeb,â⬠were included toward the year's end and were viewed as unfo rtunate. The Calendar Round: The most punctual Maya Calendars (dating from the preclassic Maya period, or around 100 A.D.) are alluded to as the Calendar Round. The Calendar Round was really two schedules that covered each other. The main schedule was the Tzolkin cycle, which comprised of 260 days, which generally relates to the hour of human incubation just as the Maya agrarian cycle. Early Mayan space experts utilized the multi day schedule to record the developments of the planets, sun and moon: it was an exceptionally consecrated schedule. At the point when utilized continuously with the standard multi day haab schedule, the two would adjust like clockwork. The Maya Long Count Calendar: The Maya built up another schedule, more qualified for estimating longer timeframes. The Maya Long Count utilized just the haab or multi day schedule. A date was given as far as Baktuns (times of 400 years) trailed by Katuns (times of 20 years) trailed by Tuns (years) trailed by Uinals (times of 20 days) and closure with the Kins (number of days 1-19). In the event that you included those numbers up, you would get the quantity of days that had gone since the beginning stage of Maya time, which was at some point between August 11 and September 8, 3114 B.C. (the specific date is dependent upon some discussion). These dates are normally communicated as a progression of numbers like so: 12.17.15.4.13 November 15, 1968, for instance. That is 12x400 years, 17x20 years, 15 years, 4x20 days in addition to eleven days since the start of Maya time. 2012 and The End of Maya Time: Baktuns - times of 400 years - are depended on a base-13 cycle. On December 20, 2012, the Maya Long Count Date was 12.19.19.19.19. At the point when one day was then included, the whole schedule reset to 0. The thirteenth Baktun since the start of Maya opportunity accordingly arrived to an end on December 21, 2012. This obviously prompted a lot of theory about emotional changes: a few forecasts for the finish of the Maya Long Count Calendar incorporated the apocalypse, another time of awareness, an inversion of the Earths attractive shafts, the appearance of the Messiah, and so on. Obviously, none of those things occurred. Regardless, chronicled Maya records don't show that they really thought about to what in particular would occur toward the finish of the schedule. Sources: Burland, Cottie with Irene Nicholson and Harold Osborne. Folklore of the Americas. London: Hamlyn, 1970. McKillop, Heather. The Ancient Maya: New Perspectives. New York: Norton, 2004.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)